Well, the gown palegreyminion is selling because it's too small for her, is too small for me too. I disbelieve that it's actually a 16 as marked. Waaah.
She's broader in the shoulders than I, which makes sense since she has a barn and horse(s) to attend to. But alas, the dress wasn't going to lace over my ribcage, even though it probably would have fit me across the shoulders. I think it was a scrawny 14, and should probably be bought by somebody who's an ample 12.
I have no idea how manufacturers decide to label things though, and why the same size fits differently depending on the garment, the cut, and the maker. I just bought a size 18 skirt a couple months ago, and it is actually still a bit big (although the size 16 was still a little tight) -- but the size 18 pants I tried on felt like they'd been sized for a stick-thin teenager.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-26 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-26 06:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-26 07:03 pm (UTC)I have no idea how manufacturers decide to label things though, and why the same size fits differently depending on the garment, the cut, and the maker. I just bought a size 18 skirt a couple months ago, and it is actually still a bit big (although the size 16 was still a little tight) -- but the size 18 pants I tried on felt like they'd been sized for a stick-thin teenager.
anti-traveling pants
Date: 2005-07-26 07:05 pm (UTC)Anna
(who hasn't been anywhere near any of those sizes for 20 years!)
Re: anti-traveling pants
Date: 2005-07-26 11:04 pm (UTC)That crossed my mind....