(no subject)
Aug. 11th, 2006 08:30 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Quoted in the New York Times:
“I really do not understand why anybody would want to go anywhere,” Bill Threlkeld wrote. “Stay home. Read a book. Tend your garden. Make love. Drink wine. But most of all — stay home.”
Suits me. I'm dreading the flights to my brother-in-law's wedding in September. Not because I'm afraid of flying. I'm sulky that I can't take my water bottle on a 4+ hour flight, and probably should forego the iPod as well. I'd much rather spend my vacation sitting on the deck here with a cold Chardonnay, in fact.
“I really do not understand why anybody would want to go anywhere,” Bill Threlkeld wrote. “Stay home. Read a book. Tend your garden. Make love. Drink wine. But most of all — stay home.”
Suits me. I'm dreading the flights to my brother-in-law's wedding in September. Not because I'm afraid of flying. I'm sulky that I can't take my water bottle on a 4+ hour flight, and probably should forego the iPod as well. I'd much rather spend my vacation sitting on the deck here with a cold Chardonnay, in fact.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-11 12:59 pm (UTC)That said, I would be angry about not being able to bring water on board. Right now, it sounds as if once you're past security at Heathrow, you can purchase things to bring on board with you unless you're flying to the US: in that case, no liquids of any sort: water, perfume, toothpaste, etc. *sigh*
I do want these draconian measures, which really don't do much of anything to keep us safe, lifted very, very soon. Of course, I resent having to take off my shoes in US airports -- as if that really does anything to make us safe. :(
Water, water...
Date: 2006-08-11 01:29 pm (UTC)Re: Water, water...
Date: 2006-08-11 04:35 pm (UTC)She was only allowed the passport, medication (non-liquid), and a wallet. They gave her a nice plastic bag for it all. Everything else was not allowed as carryon.
Re: Water, water...
Date: 2006-08-22 11:39 am (UTC)Elwynne/Heather
no subject
Date: 2006-08-11 02:10 pm (UTC)Gadgets on planes
Date: 2006-08-11 03:17 pm (UTC)No good. This latest plot supposedly was going to use cellphones to set off the explosives. If that's true, then any wireless device could have been used—and there's no way to demonstrate that your device doesn't have any wireless capabilities.
The whole "show that it works" tactic was always dumb anyway; most laptops, for example, have room to fit a non-functioning blob of something. Say, a PCMCIA card made of plastique.
Re: Gadgets on planes
Date: 2006-08-11 03:55 pm (UTC)Re: Gadgets on planes
Date: 2006-08-11 05:16 pm (UTC)Re: Gadgets on planes
Date: 2006-08-11 05:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-11 02:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-11 03:23 pm (UTC)I think in 5 years we shall have to wear approved flight 'Johnny's and check our clothes as well undeneath.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-11 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-11 04:40 pm (UTC)But a family wedding is a "must". *sigh* All the women in LAX getting upset because their makeup is getting dumped...I see their point, the stuff is expensive. But I also think that blowing up in midair because of someone else's (phony) make-up kit would be far more inconviencing.
Think I'll go home, tend the garden and drink a glass of cold chardonnay in your honor.