Sarah, Trig, and Bristol
Sep. 2nd, 2008 09:25 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
In the last week, I have gone from snickering at John McCain's choice for veep, to wondering whether he actually intends to keep her. What if she demurely says "Under the circumstances, Mr. McCain, I feel I can no longer stand as this party's nominee for vice president."
He gets the points for suggesting a conservative and a woman. She gets press. Then he can go back to a secret Plan A and choose another old white guy, during the convention, and claim it's all to mend things up. He can back away from the baby scandals and the brother-in-law and the polar bears, and pick a less-Right guy more like himself, having "shown" that he supports women in high office.
He gets the points for suggesting a conservative and a woman. She gets press. Then he can go back to a secret Plan A and choose another old white guy, during the convention, and claim it's all to mend things up. He can back away from the baby scandals and the brother-in-law and the polar bears, and pick a less-Right guy more like himself, having "shown" that he supports women in high office.
cynical thoughts
Date: 2008-09-02 01:34 pm (UTC)Re: cynical thoughts
Date: 2008-09-02 01:40 pm (UTC)Re: cynical thoughts
Date: 2008-09-02 02:08 pm (UTC)As usual in politics, what interests me is who is paying. Not that both sides don't love their lobbyists...
Re: cynical thoughts
Date: 2008-09-02 02:14 pm (UTC)Re: cynical thoughts
Date: 2008-09-02 05:24 pm (UTC)Now, what did Obama ever do to them? Or is it the (perceived) "arrogance."
Dipshits.
Re: cynical thoughts
Date: 2008-09-02 01:57 pm (UTC)Re: cynical thoughts
Date: 2008-09-02 02:09 pm (UTC)Re: cynical thoughts
Date: 2008-09-03 12:52 am (UTC)Re: cynical thoughts
Date: 2008-09-02 03:44 pm (UTC)Re: cynical thoughts
Date: 2008-09-02 05:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 01:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 02:13 pm (UTC)If it happens, McCain has some smart players on his team -- but I don't think it will.
I know McGovern, for example, ran through a bunch of picks for VP before he found someone who would accept, but I can't imagine McCain announcing Palin as his choice for VP without having made sure that she was going to take the job.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 02:41 pm (UTC)Or he shot from the hip and hit his foot.
I was thinking this morning about who would be a Palin substitute, and the only name I know that would fit is "Mike Huckabee". Vetted, no known issues, somewhat liberal for a Republican, and a Baptist Minister with sterling Christian credentials.
At this point, McCain can't lose the section of his party that just got excited for the first time since McCain secured the nomination.
I did half-wonder if we'd see a floor fight in the convention. I just picked the wrong convention to wonder about. :-)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 02:49 pm (UTC)I was somewhat horrified to find myself liking Huckabee last week, when he was interviewed on The Colbert Report. And then I reminded myself of his politics. Why can't people whose positions I loathe be brainless thugs?
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 03:04 pm (UTC)I would so much more appreciate someone who is smart, articulate, thoughtful - but disagrees with me, than the small-minded fanatic that will not stop to think about the problems and issues.
Huckabee is just as religious as Obama, as far as I can tell. They just have different visions for what their values mean and how they should be expressed.
I could not vote for Huckabee. But I remain a fan. (Just as I did not vote for GHW Bush, but remain a fan. GWB, not so very much.)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 05:37 pm (UTC)And lemme tell you, I don't think the McCain campaign met THAT mark with Palin, of bringing in someone you can be a fan of even if you won't vote for her. Cuz sheeeeez!
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 05:43 pm (UTC)Palin might be, or she might be the poster child for the Religious Right that she is being painted. Too soon to tell. She does seem to be a bit unsophisticated in her thinking, but that's a bare first impression.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 05:44 pm (UTC)Worse, there can be a floor fight at the convention over it.
Worst: she stays.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 05:27 pm (UTC)Or "Bristol" for that matter.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 06:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 06:50 pm (UTC)Meh. I'm just old fashioned. I named my children Shirley, David, and Joshua. How ordinary!
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 07:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 07:36 pm (UTC)You sure about that? LOL
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 09:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 09:07 pm (UTC)I have no opinion about the "grandson theory" except that if Bristol really is 5 months pregnant, and Trig is hers, there's some very close timing involved indeed.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 12:34 am (UTC)