ext_36948 ([identity profile] msmemory.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] msmemory_archive 2009-07-30 08:02 pm (UTC)

Oh, I figured the second note was to *expand* the list to be sure to include the Royal Peers, not to constrict it to *only* Royals. I was confooozed.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting